Verb Agreement With Total

A large proportion of subjects with this disease have been reported. I came across a sentence that I believe has a problem with the subject-verb agreement. Please find the following example: the verb in both sentences is correct depending on whether you are writing about an event in the present or in the past. (The importance of “in business” is complicated and ambiguous.) As we mentioned in our blog on “Agreement of subjects and verbs with collective nouns”, if nouns act as a unit, use a singular verb, but if the set indicates more individuality, use a plural verb. On the blog “Subject and Verb Agreement with Collective Nouns”, I focus on the question of whether a singular or plural verb should be used, depending on whether these nouns act as a unit or with individuality within the unit, regardless of British or American tendencies. The team and staff of your four sentences each seem to act as a unit. Therefore, singulate fillings and works should be used in all cases. But I`m working on a friend`s book (a commentary on the Galater book) and I came across a grammatical structure that is common, but I just don`t know what is considered right. My friend wrote, “The society that these men chose to keep were those who refused the work of Christ and chose to justify themselves by the acts of the law.” In strict terms, the company is the subject and should, as a singular, adopt a singular verb. So it sounds a bit “wrong,” as he wrote. But changing the verb to the singular “was” seems even worse. I`m going to leave things as “were,” because “that was it” looks horrible.

You can still be a little confused, and that`s okay. It`s a difficult subject! Remember to always consider the accent of your sentence. Are you talking about a total quantity or several units? And if you`re not sure, ask yourself how much? And how much? will help you find out. As for the sum, it follows pretty much the same rules as the number: A number of/sum will usually be plural, the number of/sum will be singular. Therefore, “there are 39 candidates in total” is correct. Note that Rule 6 of the subject and verb agreement is: “Generally use a plural bural with two or more subjects when connected by and there.” There are exceptions to this rule when the subjects or subjects in the sentence form a single entity or unit, a collective idea, or a unit of the idea. (They called it “the same thing,” but it might be too restrictive.) Examples we have seen, where a singular verb is used with two themes connected by and are “peanut butter and jelly is my favorite nack”, “Gain and loss are important for every business” and “spaghetti and meatballs go well with garlic bread”. In these cases, the interpretation of the “unity of the idea” rests essentially with the author of the sentence. In light of the above, either “loss of life and serious injury in our skies are unacceptable” or “loss of life and serious injury in our skies is unacceptable” is acceptable. I think Singular verb is just because the subject is a unit, but I want to be sure.

If that is not true, I would like to know the reason. Would the word man for concordance of subjects have a singular or plural verb? Example: (Tut/ Tut) the three men have reservations. From what you said, we cannot say whether you are addressing your comment to one team or more than one team, whether you are referring to the number of teams or the number of players in each team. We also don`t know what happened before this sentence to justify the beginning with the word but. Finally, the team grouping is over, which is a strange formulation. We don`t understand what that means. We`re sorry, but we can`t give a recommendation on how to write your sentence correctly. So you should say, “Ninety days in prison have been ordered.” Or avoid those sticky areas with “The accused was sentenced to 90 days in prison.” This is a different situation from the sentence: “A man does or does all the work. One could also enter the list of pronouns that are included in rule 8: “The pronouns of each, each, each, each, each, someone and someone are singular and require singular abdage .

. .

Posted in Uncategorised